Congratulations to Boris! Now perhaps we can go back to having too much food, too much drink and too much indulgence over the Christmas break, without having politics upsetting us all?
This huge victory will set the direction of politics for the next 10 years. Yes, we predict another term for BoJo starting in 2024. I am indebted to my older contact who has already pointed out that by December 2024, Labour will have only had one election-winning leader in 50 years. FIFTY YEARS!!! Step forward Tony Blair. You achieved the success that eluded Jim Callaghan, Michael Foot, Neil Kinnock, Gordon Brown, Ed Milliband and now Jeremy Corbyn. Oh, and John Smith too…… Did I miss any?
And to what can we allocate this massive swing in the vote for the Tory Party? Why, the EU!! What a change for the European project to be assisting the blues! It was the disdainful response of Frau Merkel to David Cameron’s pleas for moderating change that set the ball rolling towards a leave vote. This was compounded by the EU inaction during the referendum campaign. Where were Messrs Junckers and Tusk during the lead up to the vote? They were not in UK sharing the vision and love were they? Their next mistake was to play hardball too much with Mrs May, forcing her on to the defensive at home. One has to surmise that they thought a Remainer-Parliament was their best hope of keeping the UK on board. But they overplayed their hand, sending Theresa back with too much of a surrender bill. This off-hand treatment was compounded by the humiliation and shunning that Mrs May received from the other EU leaders at Salzburg. So the scene was set for Parliament to respond to the lack of co-operation… which led to Boris becoming leader…. which led to the election. One has to hope that they will work with Boris as an equal!
You’ve heard of meta-analyses, where academics who can’t be bothered to do their own research just nick everyone else’s hard work, crunch the numbers a bit, and come out with a super-accurate result? Well here is our META-POLL. After much reading of the papers, surfing the net, and even talking to people, we have concluded that the Tory party will win. (Bet you saw that coming eh?)
The Labour manifesto was written to appeal to hard-line left wingers – who would have voted for Jeremy anyway. Only the naïve or those too young to remember the 1970s could think that nationalisation is the answer. (See our earlier report on rail user numbers pre- and post – nationalisation). The “free” broadband idea went down well, but the practicalities are horrible. By the time it is built, at five times the original cost, technology will have made it obsolete. And the big beneficiaries will be the farmers and isolated rural communities – who will not be voting Labour under any circumstances. Meanwhile, their fence-sitting on Brexit feels a bit like “Follow Me….. I don’t know where we are going, but Follow Me!”
The Liberal Democrats have shown themselves to be neither liberal nor democratic. Their reverse Article 50 campaign can only appeal to the most die-hard europhiles. Meanwhile, Jo Swinson has not done well. Her claims to be PM in waiting invite the retort that she’ll be waiting a very long time.
The Tories have avoided a May-style manifesto-suicide-note. Divisive figures such as Rees-Mogg have been kept out of the limelight. Boris himself has picked his battles carefully, with more to lose than win.
So what happens now?
There are still considerable risks for Mr Johnson. Will the left-leaning students be too busy recovering from their end-of-term parties to vote?
Just how many people were too embarrassed to tell pollsters that they would vote Tory (but will anyway)? Will tactical voting have any impact? Will Mr Trump try to intervene? He is not great at keeping his thoughts to himself is he? That could hurt Boris. In this last week, we expect the Tories to try to refocus on Brexit as the major issue – and Labour to try to talk about virtually anything else!
What does it all mean for Asset Prices?
The market had a lost year in 2019, with too much uncertainty. A Tory win is about 70% baked into the market, so we expect a moderate bounce on 13 December. This will be most pronounced for the likes of BT and other nationalisation victims. Despite longer term trading arrangements still being in the air, we feel that 2020 will turn into a log bull run for equities and commercial property, as investors get back to the serious business of making money.
Much as we admire Nigel Farage’s consistency in supporting his cause, his present political positioning is just madness.
Clearly, he could never have thought that Boris would tear up his deal just because it is not No Deal – which seems to be Farage’s target, So what does Nigel want? Most Brexiteers can live with Boris’ deal – and many remainers can live with the withdrawal, as it least it isn’t a crash, and it moves the topic on. The Brexit Party have no chance of power, and in many close marginals, they risk drawing just enough voters away from the Tories to gift the seat to Labour or the Liberals.
Just as in Peterborough and Brecon by-elections, they could well split the leave vote, and let one of the other parties to win, with many fewer than half of the votes cast. Does Nigel really want to be the man who let Jeremy Corbyn into Number 10? We think not. So the only conclusion is that he thinks there may be a peerage in it for him if he backs down. There can be no other logical motivation for Mr Farage to take such an extreme position.
The Brexit Party will withdraw from all seats except those where the Tories have no chance anyway – ie Northern Labour-held seats. Nigel will magnanimously agree to back Boris’s deal as being better than any of the plausible alternatives. In due time, Mr Farage will enter the House of Lords.
We are three weeks away from Brexit Day, and yet there is no clarity. This is starting to look eerily familiar!
We have a PM who is trapped in office, but with no majority he is completely powerless. Meanwhile, the opposition is scared of an election, and is rather enjoying the discomfort of Boris.
It seems that the key date will be 19 October, a week on Saturday, the day when Boris is legally ordered by Parliament to write the letter asking for an extension.
Will he do it? We think not. Since the Benn Act (aka the Surrender Act) was rushed through, Boris has been at pains not to retreat from his ‘do or die’ message about 31 October. We can see why he would do that as background to his negotiations. If EU actually thought he could push through No Deal, then they would be much more keen to negotiate. This has to be true of Leo Varadker, Irish Taoiseach, who has most to lose from a No Deal. Clearly, they have not bought into that idea though.
How can these facts co-exist;-
Boris claims we will leave on 31 October, deal or no deal,
The Benn Act says he must ask for an extension in the event of no deal
The Conservatives have stated that they will not break the law
A deal looks extremely unlikely
The EU will agree to any extension request
Parliament will not let BoJo call a quick election?
It seems Boris must believe that there is a mechanism to spring free from the trap. Here is what we think could happen (yep, “could” implies our low level of confidence in our prediction).
The Queen’s Speech next week will essentially be the Conservative manifesto for an autumn election. It will get voted down, but still the opposition will not allow an election.
The big day will be 19 October, in the special Saturday Parliamentary session called by the Government. We see the following votes;-
A vote to lift the Benn Act and allow a No Deal to happen. This will be designed and phrased in terms of progressing or overturning the referendum result, to try to make the opposition look like it is ignoring the plebiscite. Narrowly, we think this will be voted down.
A vote to call a General Election. This will be designed to make the opposition look like it is scared of facing the electorate, especially given that they have earlier voted to “ignore the referendum”.
This is when Boris Johnson resigns as Prime Minister, and where he states that he will not do the usual caretaking role until a new one is appointed. We feel that BoJo has too much political capital tied up to write that letter. It would be interesting if Parliament voted to make him personally write a letter in which he does not believe. If he does not resign, I see him taking a jail sentence as less politically damaging than writing a letter.
If we have no Prime Minister – and hence no Government – then there will inevitably be a court case as to who can write the letter.
Then there is 14 days for a new Government to be formed. We do not think Mr Corbyn could attract enough support, as the LibDems will see little advantage of positioning themselves as Labour’s poodle.
A government of “National Unity”, which even the media have Christened “National Remainers” also seems unlikely, given how the various factions of the remainers struggle to agree on anything.
Another Conservative would be the natural choice, as they have the largest party…. could that be dragged out for the remaining 12 days?
So we drift towards 31 October……. no Prime Minister, no Government, political chaos.
Away from Westminster, the negative respect for the political classes plumbs new depths.
When the referendum result was declared, the best outcome would have been a clear, firm date three years (or even five years) ahead, for which everyone could plan and prepare, leading to the most seamless transition possible. Instead of which the political classes in London, Brussels and Dublin have screwed it up right royally. By their constant bickering and game-playing, we are now in the worst possible situation. It is no wonder that the general public is coming to despise politicians.
Oh, and as for the details of Boris’s Plan, we don’t know. We’re not even sure that he knows……
Parliament has been prorogued! And the important news for word-puzzle fans is that this ‘new’ verb is indeed in the Collins Scrabble Dictionary.
But one has to ask, why did they do it? (I mean Boris, not Collins) And why in such a half-hearted manner? Conference season is coming up, so despite the headline “FIVE WEEK SUSPENSION”, in reality the proroguesion (Nope, that one isn’t a Scrabble word. Anyone got a number for Collins?) only made a few days difference to the actual sitting of Parliament. More importantly, the timing was such that Parliament had time to push through the no-deal bill that was always in prospect, and so the closing of Parliament had no real impact at all.
To us, this high-profile political act was all about Team Boris tweaking Parliament’s tail, and continuing the theme of showing Parliament being against the referendum result and Boris battling manfully to enable what the people chose: Boris and the people versus Parliament if you like.
The two attempts by Boris to provoke a general election should be seen in the same light. The opposition parties saw a trick in that should an election have been called, selection of the date is in Boris’ gift, and hence he could choose a date after Brexit. However, forcing a second vote on the same issue gives the game away. The vote was for public consumption, designed to show the lengths to which Boris will go to deliver Brexit – even risk losing power – and the determination of the other parties to stop it. The subtlety of it being a no-deal Brexit that was stopped will be air-brushed over. This will be shown as Labour being determined to ignore the result of the referendum – and being frightened to face the electorate.
The third piece of evidence, m’lud, is Boris’s stated promise never to request an extension to Article 50, despite the eeyores of this world threatening him with prison. How much of a martyr would that make him? I note with surprise that ex-cons are allowed to stand as MP’s, so even if he was imprisoned, it would not prevent his comeback as a hero.
So, dear reader, you have a choice to make. Do you think that the current administration is ricocheting wildly from one crisis to another? This would not be out of alignment with the public image Boris has cultivated over many years.
Or is this all a careful scheme, planned as the best option to cope with an unfavourable parliament? Boris is setting himself up as the people’s champion, fighting to the death (figuratively rather then literally we hope) to enact the referendum, and being frustrated at every turn by the self-important knuckle-heads in Parliament. Then when the inevitable election comes, Boris emerges with a very strong message. Dominic Cummings is a master at this kind of game…… we see a very Cummings plan Baldrick!
Every week it seems that some self-appointed climate fascists are instructing us that we need to stop eating and drinking in order to “save the planet”. As Global Warming has evolved into Climate Change then Extinction Rebellion, ever-more shrill instructions about how we should live our lives are issued, with the threat of dire consequences should we fail to accede to their demands. Is it only me that observes the same tone of dire-threats and moral righteousness that were so prevalent in the CND anti-nuclear armageddon protesters of a generation ago – or indeed the religious zealots of the previous millennia? Their chant was “do as we say, or you’ll burn for an eternity”, which, come to think of it, is pretty much what the anti-western-economies lot are telling us about temperature change.
Anyway, back to the topic. For a number of years, agriculture has been blamed for a very substantial proportion of UK greenhouse gas emissions, with as much as 25% of the total quoted as being sourced from farming. These numbers are grabbed by vegan enthusiasts to shriek that we all need to stop eating meat or we’ll burn in hell for all eternity. Okay, so maybe I paraphrased them a little, but the point remains.
However, the science they are using is duff. According to Prof Myles Allen of Oxford University Environmental Change Institute, quoted in the Sustainable Food Trust, the picture is much more nuanced. Back in February, we mentioned that the finger points at the methane released by cows. In the approach used by the International Panel on Climate Change, methane is treated as equivalent to carbon dioxide in its greenhouseness (like my new word?) The true picture is that carbon dioxide is chemically stable and stays in the atmosphere for hundreds of years. Meanwhile, methane breaks down rather quickly, and so has a much smaller impact on the atmosphere. The case against cows has been extensively overstated.
At a conference organised by the Country Land and Business Association, Labour spokesman Barry Gardiner suggested that British farming should be part of the solution to global warming by producing less food and planting trees instead. To put it mildly, this approach doesn’t pass even the most cursory scrutiny. (Ha that originally I typed “What a moronic idea!” before professionalism got the better of me). Does Mr Gardiner think that the UK population will eat less? All that his madcap scheme would achieve is more food imports. So the food production leads to the same emissions, just somewhere else in the world. Then the food is transported to the UK, with all the emissions entailed. Mr Gardiner’s scheme actually would increase global emissions. We do like the idea of more tree planting, but to claim that replacing UK food production with forests would reduce emissions is just wrong.
Agriculture is not the huge emitter of greenhouse gases that the hysterical brigade would have you think. Carry on eating healthy nutritious meat and dairy products, comfortable in the knowledge that locally sourced food has low airmiles and supports high-quality, high-welfare British farming.
Cripes, doesn’t Boris love poking the hornets’ nest with a sharp stick?
The reality of his decision to close this Parliamentary session and arrange a Queen’s Speech to initiate a new Parliament is relatively small. Instead of Parliament having a recess for three and a half weeks over the party conference season, the break is five weeks. However, it has acted as a lightning rod for all of the pent up frustration and anger of the Remainers. Suddenly, they can see their case is lost. It was lost before, but now they can no longer pretend to themselves that they still have a chance.
So now the Remainers have only one option left – win a vote of No Confidence next week and force an election before the end of October. This would be welcomed by the Boris team, as discussed yesterday, who have developed a suite of policies on which to campaign, and have clearly judged that such a poll would be winnable.
Our view is that;-
The Remainers will not be able to win a vote of No Confidence
It is far from clear that Mr Corbyn will even dare to call one (see 1. above)
The EU will have to sit up and realise that the Remainers will not postpone Brexit
The EU needs to avoid blame for No-Deal, and so see a deal as necessary.
Suddenly, to us, a No-Deal Brexit seems less likely than it did 24 hours ago.
We enjoyed the great mutterings in the press since the weekend about whether the Tories secretly want to have an election BEFORE Brexit day on Halloween.
It appears to have been started by Tim Shipman in the Sunday Times, who suggested that the Government would quite like to have an election on 17 October. However, recognising voter-fatigue, they want Labour to take the hit from the Brenda-of-Bristols who are annoyed at “Not Another One”. The thinking goes that Boris is far ahead in the polls, and so could attend the Euro summit the next day with more power to his elbow, and really give the EU leaders what-for!
The polite word to describe these rumours is bunkum. (The less-polite word also begins with B and has two syllables.) There are two major flaws with the plan. The first is that 18 October is way too close to Brexit day, and so no matter how much power there is at Boris’s elbow (or anywhere else on his anatomy) there just isn’t time for a deal to be pulled together and approved in all the places in which it needs to be passed. Also, two weeks before B-day is just about the worst time to be holding an election – project fear will be in full swing and the media will be full of the impending doom. Boris and his team certainly need to be planning on how to win the peace after B day at that point, but the public may have more pressing matters on their minds.
The Anti-Brexit Forces Are Too Split to Perform
Another week and another proposal from the anti-Brexit brigade. Part of their problem is that they all have agendas so different that they cannot agree on a shared approach.
Last week, it was J Corbyn’s dream of rounding up support to propel him into No 10. That wasted another 7 days of precious time. However, putting Mr Corbyn into No 10 was a suitable objective for only Mr Corbyn.
This week, the rebels seem to have dropped the idea of an early no-confidence motion. So perhaps the Sunday papers’ double bluff about the Tories wanting such a thing was successful after all? The latest plan is to take control of Parliament and pass legislation to force Mr Johnson to extend Brexit. The trouble is, all of the people involved are playing politics, working out whether such a step helps their own person ambitions. However, despite Mr Bercow’s self-belief, the Government controls order papers, and can easily string out any arguments about procedure – perhaps reminding Parliament that they are not in the business of dis-obeying instructions from the electorate.
Meanwhile, Frau Merkel’s sarcastic comment to Boris suggesting he should try to solve the Irish backstop in 30 days (when it hasn’t been closed down in over 30 months) has held open the prospect of a last minute deal, taking away some fire from the stop-No-deal faction of the anti-Brexit rabble.
What Will Happen?
In our view – remember, we are almost as clueless as the next person, depending on who that next person happens to be – Boris has got B-day in the bag for 31 October. It feels like there will be too much egg-on-face for the EU to renegotiate, and so a No-deal Brexit seems the most likely outcome. However, this time there has been ample warning, and so trade will keep flowing, people will continue to travel, and most of the strain will happen behind the scenes. This is kind of the inverse of the fig-leaf Brexit we forecast in the spring, when we thought a net-curtain of a deal would happen to save face. Now it looks like both sides will rush towards No-Deal, for the message that will send to their own electorates, but behind the scenes everything will function!
Hahahahahahahhahahahahha. Hats off to whoever thought of proposing Jeremy Corbyn to be Prime Minister. Perhaps the most fundamental question about having the Labour leader in charge of a “Government of National Unity” to solve the Brexit dilemma is, does anybody know what Mr Corbyn’s ideal Brexit would look like? So far the only clear Labour policy has been to oppose whatever Mrs May tried to get through Parliament. That was opportunistic politics, not conviction-based positioning. It is widely believed that Jeremy himself is in favour of Brexit, but it appears from the sketchy plans seen so far that the National Unity Government would actually be a Parliamentary Unity Government whose sole purpose was to delay Brexit and call a General Election. It is tough to see how frustrating again the 52% of leavers would lead to any unity within the country.
There cannot be many Tory MPs who want an election: and there must be even fewer who would want to face even their constituency party, let alone the electorate, after putting a Marxist in No 10. Then there is the difficult issue of Scottish Nationalism. Would Corbyn and Co be prepared to sanction another Scottish referendum as the price of SNP support? That would make the £1bn bung to Northern Ireland to buy DUP support look rather cheap. Even with the SNP, there is zero chance of Mr Corbyn building a parliamentary majority. Even some of his own MPs wouldn’t back him.
What is most revealing about this whole farrago is that St Jeremy bought into the idea hook, line and sinker. He truly believed it could work. Like a first year schoolboy persuaded by the sixth form to stand for Head Boy, he seemed to genuinely hope that it could happen. Oh yes, come to think of it, that’s how he became Labour leader – the outsider added to the ballot paper for a laugh.
Silly Season Story No.2 – Ken Clarke for PM
Come on Ken, surely you must have seen that one coming through the cigar smoke? At least you had the nous to claim no involvement until the fuss died down. Thus you saved some of your dignity.
Silly Season Story No. 3 – Donald Trump Wants to Buy a Country
Well it would be the real-estate deal of the century – and you know what, he could still pull it off. Going public may well be a tactic to soften up the Danish people into selling off an asset they cannot exploit to someone who can!
Hey….. wait a minute. If Donald J wants to buy a rugged, freezing, mountainous country with too much snow and ice…… well we know he loves Scotland! Call Boris, I’ve got an idea!!
Even before the vote counting has started, it seems clear that by tomorrow the Brexit Party will have their first MP. Their candidate, Mike Greene, has run a slick campaign in a leave-town. The Tories seem to have lost more support than Labour, and may well be beaten into fourth place by the Lib-Dems.
What does this mean?
The Blues will yet again be reminded of the danger of Farage’s Flying Circus. More power to Boris Johnson’s leadership challenge and his promise of “October Means October” (though, oddly, he is not using that phrase!) The Conservative Party must be seen to deliver Brexit on time and Boris is positioned perfectly for this predictable development. Who said he is a buffoon??
You will remember when Parliament voted to prevent No-Deal on 3rd April. It was the only thing they seem to have agreed on all year. Yet it was passed by one vote. As the Metro breathlessly reported, it was the then Peterborough MP, newly released from prison with a curfew tag, that swung the numbers. Anger at jailbird MP who ‘stopped Brexit’ in Bill that was won by one vote
It is fair to assume that the new Brexit-Party Peterborough MP is unlikely to vote against No Deal in any repeat of this motion. Suddenly the mathematics are reversed. Instead of passing by one vote, any new Yvette Cooper bill would fail by one vote. Parliament will not stop No-Deal a second time.
Funny how a by-election in a sleepy backwater could have such a large impact on our national destiny.
We see Boris as PM by 22 July. He needs Brexit on time, Deal or No Deal. The EU has little negotiating capacity and even less desire to rewrite the Withdrawal Agreement in such a short timeframe. Parliament cannot stop No deal. Boris cannot afford to blink and request a delay.